NatRevMD
The RECOVER Score
Start the Diagnostic →
For independent, physician-owned practices

What Are Your Revenue-Cycle Numbers Hiding?

The RECOVER Score is a physician-built diagnostic across seven revenue-cycle dimensions. In a few minutes you'll get a directional score and revenue-leak range. If your practice has more than one provider or location, it also gives you a first look at how performance varies across your team.

Get My RECOVER Score →
Built on the same RECOVER Framework used in our full revenue-cycle reviews
Free About 4 minutes No patient data
What you get
Score + directional range
?
/ 100
Your RECOVER Score
seven dimensions, one number
Built for
$300K to $10M+ practices
7
Revenue-cycle dimensions scored
~4 min
To complete, no login
$300K-$10M+
Built for independent practices at any stage
The methodology

Seven dimensions, one score

Built on the same RECOVER Framework we use in full revenue-cycle reviews, adapted here into a self-serve diagnostic. Each one is a business question, not a billing quiz.

Rate of Claims Denial

Can leadership identify where denials are concentrated, by payer, provider, or location, or does the practice only see one overall rate?

Eligibility Verification Gaps

How consistent is front-end verification across the practice? Gaps here usually turn into patient collections later, which are harder to recover.

Clean Claims Ratio

How much variation exists in coding and documentation quality across providers, and would leadership know if one provider was pulling the average down?

Outstanding AR Age

When AR increases, can you tell what's driving it, or does it show up only as one total number with no way to trace the cause?

Velocity of Follow-Up

Does follow-up capacity scale with visit volume, or does the same team quietly fall further behind as the practice grows?

Enrollment & Credentialing

How quickly does a new provider become fully billable? Every day of delay is revenue that doesn't come back later.

Revenue Per Visit Benchmark

Can you identify a meaningful revenue-per-visit difference between providers seeing similar patients, and would you know why?

Directional, not diagnosed yet

Where revenue-cycle gaps tend to concentrate

A rough, illustrative share of annual revenue at risk per dimension, when that dimension is weak. Not a claim about your practice; your own result is based on your own answers.

Denial concentration
3.2%
Credentialing lag
3.0%
Coding consistency
2.8%
Revenue-per-visit spread
2.7%
Follow-up capacity
2.6%
Eligibility verification
2.4%
AR visibility
2.2%
These are the per-dimension rates the diagnostic uses when a dimension scores weak. Your own directional range only includes the dimensions the questions actually cover for your practice.
Why this matters as you grow

Growth doesn't create revenue-cycle problems. It makes them harder to see.

When an owner can see nearly every part of the revenue cycle personally, a small issue is usually manageable. As a practice adds providers, locations, or staff, the same issue doesn't get bigger on its own. It just gets harder to spot, and more expensive to leave alone. More providers means more room for the same process to be handled differently. More locations means more room for workflow inconsistencies to take root. More claims means a small denial-rate difference turns into a meaningful dollar figure. The average tells you how the practice is doing. The variation tells you where to look.

Get My RECOVER Score →
Built for independent growth, at any stage

Built for independent practices from $300K to $10M in annual revenue

This isn't a tool built for one size of practice. The diagnostic is the same seven dimensions at every stage; what changes is how much provider- and location-level detail applies to you.

$300K-$1M

Still close to the numbers

You're probably still close to day-to-day billing yourself. The most useful thing this can do is tell you where to look first.

$1M-$3M

Growing, and getting more complex

The practice is growing. The real question is usually whether your processes are keeping pace with it.

$3M-$10M+

Multiple providers or locations

The question becomes where performance is varying across the group, and what the group-wide average might be hiding.

Why trust this diagnostic

Built by physicians who read the whole revenue cycle

We're physician-led, not a billing vendor running a generic assessment. Dr. Heather Signorelli, DO, a practicing pathologist and NatRevMD's co-founder, was named a Modern Healthcare Top Emerging Leader.

5+ yrs
In business, built for independent practices
30+
Independent practice relationships
25%+
Typical collections increase, up to 60% for some
If you already have a billing team

You don't need to change anything to take a closer look

Many of the practices that run this diagnostic already have an RCM company, an internal billing team, or a mix of both. That's fine. This isn't a verdict on your current team, and running it doesn't require switching anything. It's an independent read on your own numbers, done by you, in a few minutes, with nothing shared and no changes required.

Get My RECOVER Score →
Verified on Google

In their words.

Excellent ★★★★★ Based on 10 reviews Google
D
Daniel Wandsneider
Google review
Google
★★★★★ 1 year ago

"My group had been using a different company, we decided to make the change when our communication expectations..."

Read on Google →
L
Dr. Liz Newell
Google review
Google
★★★★★ 2024

"NatRevMD's team has kept us afloat in trying times post-COVID and brought our A/R back down to under 20% when it was..."

Read on Google →
K
Karen Wolowick
Google review
Google
★★★★★ Sep 7, 2026

"Absolutely great team! They know what they are doing. Excellent communication. They make my life so much easier!"

Read on Google →
B
Breyona Hill
Google review
Google
★★★★★ Sep 8, 2026

"Love working with this company! Heather and her team are always on top of everything for our practice and we are s..."

Read on Google →
K
Karen Kaufman
Google review
Google
★★★★★ Jun 28, 2025

"I switched my medical practice billing over to NatRevMD six months ago, and seen a complete turnaround, experienci..."

Read on Google →
Z
Zac Kuchta
Google review
Google
★★★★★ Jul 10, 2024

"Saved my butt not once but twice." I really tried to keep billing in house at my practice, but NRC provided a better mor...

Read on Google →
Critical0-49
At Risk50-69
Strong70-84
Optimal85-100

The RECOVER Score

A few questions about how your practice manages and sees its own revenue cycle, whether you're a single-provider practice or a multi-site group. At the end you'll get a score out of 100 and a directional revenue-opportunity range based on your own answers.

About 4 minutes Nothing shared publicly Built for $300K-$10M+ practices
Before we start
Tell us about the practice.
Your result
Here's what your answers suggest.
0
/ 100
Calculating your RECOVER Score...
Your strongest area
Biggest area to investigate
Where the risk appears to be

Directional annual opportunity
$— - $—
This is a directional estimate based on your practice's size and responses. It is not an audit finding, a guarantee, or a representation of actual recoverable revenue.
Where the estimate is coming from